BREAKING: The young Co-Op start up of 2014 will be shutting down Dec 31, 2015. With membership totals approx. 200,000+ the early exit comes as a shocking surprise despite their recent losses and 15-20% rate increase approved for 2016.
On Friday, a joint announcement came from the state Department of Financial Services, the Department of Health and the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), with DFS directing Health Republic to cease writing new health insurance policies and begin an orderly wind-down of business.
“Given Health Republic’s financial situation, commencing an orderly wind down process before the upcoming open enrollment period is the best course of action to protect consumers,” said Anthony Albanese, acting superintendent at DFS. “Moving forward, we will work closely with New York State of Health and federal regulators to help ensure continuity of coverage for Health Republic’s customers.”CMS officials said decision was made after state and federal agencies determined it was likely Health Republic would become financially insolvent.
According to recent announcements Health Republic of NY was exiting the small group and individual markets for Mid-Hudson, Albany, and Utica/Watertown regions. These counties include: Albany, Columbia, Delaware, Dutchess, Essex, Greene, Hamilton, Oneida, Orange, Oswego, Putnam, Rensselaer, Saratoga, Schenectady, Sullivan, Ulster, Warren, and Washington. The reasoning was the high delivery costs driven by Provider consolidation, see https://healthrepublicny.org/media/2563/faqs-service-area-reductions.pdf.
With recent exits for Insurers such Atlantis, Emblem Health/GHI and Empire blue Cross the transitions were handled differently. Some allowed groups to see their plan through renewal anniversary date or end of year. Further announcements are expected on transition of coverage.
Our Agency as in the past will be out and early in front positioning our clients for best options. For more information on this or to schedule a call please contact us firstname.lastname@example.org today.
Ok so unless you’ve been stuck in the Arctic for a year you’ve been hearing a lot about this heated topic. Everyone has strong feelings about it evidently, I myself included, but I have stayed away from the fray for the most part.
As congress takes their August recess and those who still have jobs are on vacation I thought its a good time to put my two cents into it.
This well done score card brought to you by Empire Blue Cross is a great illustration of the leading proposals and voices in Washington. A nicely published overview by the Lewin Group is actually a great read on the proposed Government Sponsored Health Plan. The analysis covers the bill as it appeared on July 15, 2009.
Bills Key Provisions:
Require all Americans to purchase health insurance or be fined, although those making less than $88,000 annually would be able to get a subsidy.
Get rid of copays and deductibles for preventative care
Make it illegal to deny coverage for pre-existing conditions
Create a public plan
Raise taxes for the wealthy – as much at 5.4 percent for incomes above $350,000
But what are we really talking about? A Government Plan to compete with private payers? Really?
The assumption in the study is that the government plan pays Medicare Rates. Provider reimbursements are on average 70% of private insurance reimbursements. The specter of physicians opting out of this plan is rather daunting as they would be giving up the single largest payer.
How does a private insurer compete with a government plan? Imagine a Government-owned subsidized Automobile competing with private companies? Would they not print more tax payer money and pump them up? Oh wait that’s already happened in Detroit, bad example.
The President claims that a government plan does already work and its name is Medicare. Yet, Medicare we are also told will go broke as early as by 2018 reported by Washington Post. Medicare, meanwhile, now pays private insurers to take care of seniors under the Medicare Advantage Plans. It is cheaper for the government to do this than to manage it themselves
So which one is it? Does the Medicare plan work now and is proof of what’s to come or is it costly and inefficient and unsustainable?
Clearly the costs are indeed high and I question what insurers are thinking with some of the rate increases. This year, especially, I’ve seen increases of over 20% from the top carriers.
Speaking of Medicare, the Part D Plan in 2003 was just a gift to the Pharmaceutical industry’s under the Bush administration. Many people didn’t realize that the language used barred the U.S. from negotiating drug pricing. How can Canada with an entire population of 33 mill pay 50% on the dollar while 40 million US seniors pay full retail? Coincidentally, the legislators of Medicare Part D earned themselves nice cushy paying Pharmaceutical jobs within 1 year.
Obama has easily gotten concessions from Big Pharma, Insurers and the AMA (provided there is tort reform) already and I applaud him for it. There probably is even more good news to come on this.
What may be an interesting possible outcome are Regional Health Insurance Co-ops. These are a bridge between government and non-government options. The co-op alternative, led by Sen. Kent Conrad (D-ND), continued to gain traction on both sides of the aisle. The plan would call for the creation of nonprofit health cooperatives in lieu of public health insurance options. Said Sen. Baucus, “.The Conrad approach has got legs…it’s quite viable.”
On the House side, Rep. Roy Blunt (R-MO), chairing the Health Care Solutions Group, released an alternative to the House Democratic plan that he “hopes will receive bipartisan support.”
An example of this is GroupHealth in Washington State. “At Group Health, doctors are rewarded for consulting by telephone and secure e-mail, which allows for longer appointments. Patients are assigned a team of primary care practitioners who are responsible for their well-being. Medical practices, and insurance coverage decisions, are driven by the company’s own research into which drugs and procedures are most effective.” A good piece in last months’ NYT. discusses this.
There are many versions of this and perhaps there ought to be Federal provisions and overall guidelines but with regional flexibility afforded to each state. This topic requires further discussion and I will tackle it next month.