by admin | Mar 7, 2013 | Health Care Reform, Health Exchanges, State Exchanges
Map of State Exchanges Final. The final map of 2014 State Exchanges or health insurance marketplaces are now in.
States have had the option of either using Federal Grants to establish their own Exchanges or letting the Federal run their State’s Exchange. There is even a middle version, a Partnership Exchange Program. Under this arrangement, the State might oversee the selection and management of health plans and assisting people with enrollment. The federal government would have primary responsibility for the remaining marketplace operations, including managing the marketplace, their websites and call centers, accepting applications, and determining eligibility for premium subsidies.
Seventeen states and the District of Columbia have received conditional approval from HHS to operate a state-run marketplace in 2014. These states are: California, Colorado, Connecticut, Hawaii, Idaho, Kentucky, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nevada, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Rhode Island, Utah, Vermont, and Washington.
This map is very close to last years blog we posted Map of State Exchanges Status May 2012 . For the most part this goes by partisan lines with majority of Federally Run State Exchanges located in GOP Governor States. An example of this is highlighted in our blog on NJ Exchange Chrstie Rejects State Exchange.
It is vital that as many uninsured’s get health coverage. Nationally approximately 30 million people are expected to gain coverage with 600,000 in States like NY.
Error: Contact form not found.
by admin | Dec 11, 2012 | Health Care Reform, Health Exchanges, Obamacare, State Exchanges
Governor Christie vetoes Health Insurance Exchange – Washington Post “Christie Vetoes Obamacare”.
“New Jersey and all other states still await substantial federal guidance on the functioning of all three types of exchanges,” Mr. Christie said in his veto message. “To be sure, the decision of whether to move forward with a state-based exchange can only be fully understood when competitively compared to the overall value of the other options.”
States have until Dec. 14 to decide whether to establish a state-based exchange. They have more time to decide whether to partner with the federal government or let federal bureaucrats design and run the state exchange. Many states with Republican governors have said they would not participate in the process, citing their opposition to the law and its potential costs. This is the current Map of State Exchange Status.
What is an Exchange? One of the centerpieces of the recently passed Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) is the establishment of state based health insurance exchanges by the year 2014.
An “Exchange” is a mechanism for organizing the health insurance marketplace to help consumers and small businesses shop for coverage in a way that permits easy comparison of
available plan options based on price, benefits, service and quality. By pooling individuals and small groups together, transaction costs can be reduced and transparency can be increased.
Exchanges can create more efficient and competitive markets for individuals and small employers.
States have until Dec. 14 to decide whether to establish a state-based exchange. They have more time to decide whether to partner with the federal government or let federal bureaucrats design and run the state exchange. Many states with Republican governors have said they would not participate in the process, citing their opposition to the law and its potential costs.
Many Republican governors were saying before the Court ruling that the Medicaid expansion was yet another unfunded federal mandate they could not afford. Yes the Supreme Court ruling has given the Republican governors enormous leverage. Republican governors have long argued that state control and flexibility can save lots of Medicaid money. If they put a reasonable plan on the table to expand their Medicaid programs to 133% of poverty–one that saves at least as much as their state match–it could be a win for everyone. The Republican governors get their flexibility and the Obama administration gets their expansion.