The people have spoken at least for now and they are saying they are unhappy. The storm clouds over Obmacare has ushered in GOP victories: +7 Senate + 13 House. 47% of those who cast ballots in the midterms said the 2010 health care law, which opened for enrollment a year ago, went too far. On the other hand, 26 percent said the law didn’t go far enough, CNN exit polls reported. Only 22 percent said Obamacare was just about right.
How will GOP use these powerful election gains on Obamacare?
GOP still will not have the needed 60 Senate Seats to repeal the Affordable Care Act. That said, they will now be able to pass budget rules on the legislation since the Courts ruled individual mandate penalty as a “tax”. Reinsurance funds such as Risk corridors could also be on the chopping block. Other examples would be the definition of “full-time” employee taxes on employer penalties (bipartisan support), medical devices & tanning salons etc.
According to Huffington Post article GOP-Controlled Congress Expected To Try To Repeal, Weaken ACA while Republicans have been “chomping at the bit to repeal Obamacare” since it was signed into law in 2010, even a GOP-controlled Congress is unlikely to undo the law. However, that won’t stop Republicans from forcing at least one vote on repeal. President Obama “would then swiftly veto it, but not before Democratic senators were forced to cast a vote very directly in support of Obamacare, which remains generally unpopular.” Additionally, the GOP might take aim at several provisions of the ACA, such as the individual mandate, the employer mandate, the Independent Payment Advisory Board, and the medical device tax. Some Senate Democrats would likely join them in eliminating or amending some of these measures.
A Democrat President governing with both Houses going GOP may not be so bad after all. The successful Clinton Presidency had to contend with the same balancing act. Two decades later, the key question is can both branches find a common ground and a productive working relationship?
For specific details on all available health plans in 2015, contact our team at Millennium Medical Solutions Corp (855)667-4621. We work in coordination with Navigators to assist with medicaid, CHIP Child Health Plus, Family Health Plus and Medicare Dual Eligibles. We have Spanish, Russian, and Hebrew speakers available. Quotes can also be viewed on our site.
Adding a one-month orientation period may help an employer avoid complying with the new health benefits. Federal agencies are offering employers a benefits-free 30 day orientation period option in final regulations. There is also clarification on how employers must treat certain categories of new hires, as either FT , PT or Seasonal employees
The Final Regulations
These final regulations provide that the one month period would be determined by adding one calendar month and subtracting one calendar day, measured from an employee’s start date in a position that is otherwise eligible for coverage. For example, if an employee’s start date in an otherwise eligible position is May 3, the last permitted day of the orientation period is June 2. Similarly, if an employee’s start date in an otherwise eligible position is October 1, the last permitted day of the orientation period is October 31.
The new regulations implement part of the “employer shared responsibility mandate” provisions created by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA). In all categories of new hire the e final regulations provide that one month is the maximum allowed length of an employment-based orientation period. For any period longer than one month that precedes a waiting period, the 90-day period begins after an individual is otherwise eligible to enroll under the terms of a group health plan.
When must an employer offer coverage:
The final regulations continue to provide that if a group health plan conditions eligibility on an employee’s having completed a reasonable and bona fide employment-based orientation period, the eligibility condition is not considered to be designed to avoid compliance with the 90-day waiting period limitation if the orientation period does not exceed one month and the maximum 90-day waiting period begins on the first day after the orientation period.
These final regulations apply to group health plans and health insurance issuers for plan years beginning on or after January 1, 2015.
When the Employer Might be Subject to a Penalty:
If at least one full-time employee of the employer buys health insurance in a public Exchange (Marketplace) and qualifies for a subsidy (either a premium tax credit or a cost-sharing reduction), the employer must pay a penalty.
There are two different types of penalties.
)The IRC section 4980H(a) penalty applies if a large employer offers coverage to less than 70% of its full-time employees in 2015 (or to less than 95% after the 2015 plan year). This penalty is $2000 annually or $166.67/month times the total number of “full-time” employees minus the first 80 (minus the first 30 after 2015). The penalty calculation does not include variable hour or seasonal employees who are in their measurement or administrative periods, even if they in fact worked on average at least 30 hours/week or 130/month during those periods. Nor does it include those who are in their stability periods but who did not qualify for coverage based on their hours worked during the associated measurement period.
IRC section 4980H(b) penalty. It applies if a large employer offers coverage to at least 70% of its full-time employees (95% after 2015), but for some full-time employees the coverage is either not “affordable” or does not provide minimum value. This penalty is $3,000 annually or $250/month for each full-time employee who buys health insurance in a public Exchange (Marketplace) and qualifies for a subsidy and for whom the employee cost for self-only coverage under the lowest-cost option available from the employer is more than 9.5% of the employee’s household income (or one of three safe harbors), or for whom the employer coverage offered does not provide at least minimum value. Again, the penalty calculation does not apply if the employee who qualified for a subsidy was a variable hour or seasonal employee who was in his/her measurement or administrative periods, nor does it include those employees who are in their stability periods but who did not qualify for coverage based on their hours worked during the associated measurement period. Additionally, the (b) penalty cannot be more than the (a) penalty would have been had it applied.
Summary and Employer Action Items
The bottom line is this:
If you hire a non-seasonal employee whom you reasonably expect (at date of hire) to work at least 30 hours/week or 130 hours/month, you must track hours each calendar month and offer benefits by the first day of the fourth month if the employee averages at least 130 hours/month for the first three months. This applies even if you hire this employee for a short-term position or a summer internship (unless you take the position, upon advice from your legal counsel, that a summer intern is a “seasonal” employee).
If you hire a non-seasonal employee and you cannot reasonably determine at date of hire if they will work on average at least 30 hours/week (130 hours/month), you can track their hours over their “initial measurement period” and not offer benefits until the associated “stability period,” if the employee averaged at least 130 hours/ month during the measurement period. The stability period might not begin until 13-14 months after the date of hire.
If you hire an employee who meets the new definition of a “seasonal employee,” you can track their hours over their “initial measurement period” and not offer benefits until the associated “stability period” if they averaged at least 130 hours/month during the initial measurement period. You do not have to offer benefits by the first day of the fourth month.
A copy of the final regulations can be obtained by clicking on the link below:
Sign up for latest news updates. Please contact us for immediate information on how to implement these initiatives for your group-specific needs at info@medicalsolutionscorp.com or Call (855) 667-4621.
Congratulations – you just signed up successfully for Obamacare! You made it right before the March 31st deadline and avoided the individual penalty and getting blocked out for 2014. Don’t relax just yet. If you’re one of the many people who applied on the first open enrollment it’s smart to expect some bumps over the next few weeks. Shifting deadlines and technical glitches have left many insurance companies scrambling to catch up to the flood of requests. To make sure you start things right, here are some easy ways to stay vigilant:
Pay the premium –Until you pay for the plan you do not truly have a plan just yet. Some states and insurance companies have extended the deadline to pay, but its best to do this as soon as possible. For maximum peace of mind, get written confirmation from your new insurance company. If you go to the doctor before you pay your premium, you may end up footing that medical bill if the insurance company doesn’t have a record of your premium payment.
Member ID Cards –in about 1–2 weeks after you receive your first bill you will receive your Member ID card from your carrier after you’ve made your first premium payment. This is the card you’ll share with medical providers and pharmacies when you receive service. Your carrier may allow you to print a temporary ID card if you need care prior to receiving your Member ID card(s). Your insurance card will (hopefully) arrive in your mailbox in early January. You’ll present it wherever you need services: at the pharmacy, doctor’s office or hospital. Since insurance companies had a very short turnaround time to process new members, you may see a delay. Don’t panic! Go to the insurance company’s website to see if you can print a temporary ID card. (This is a lifesaver!) If you turn up empty, call the company’s customer service number to confirm that you are in their system as an enrolled member.
Don’t rush to the doctors – If you have an immediate need for a prescription or an appointment, by all means take care of it asap. But if you can, wait a few weeks before scheduling your doctor’s visit. This will give time for the insurance companies and doctors to update their systems with all the new plans and enrollees. This way, you help ensure that the medical claim for your doctor’s visit will be processed accurately – and that you dodge some of the early-stage craziness.
Double check – that your doctor is in your new plan’s network . Most of the new insurance plans also came with new provider networks. Its smart to double check that your favorite doctor is in the network for the exact plan you just enrolled in. There are specific networks for different insurance products, so make sure you are checking the right one. If your doctor is not in the network, keep in mind that you may have to pay significantly more money to see an out-of-network doctor, so you may consider switching. See States Pushing Back Against Smaller Networks
Keep records – Keep a record of your payments, calls, emails with your insurance company and physicians. Just in case of a technical glitch in the insurance or doctor’s computer systems, you can show evidence of your payment or confirmations from your insurance company.
Obamacare 2014 Deadline Nearing. You are now more knowledgable than most after reading this article. Given all the new changes thanks to the new insurance plans, new enrollees, and changing deadlines, being aware of these simple tips will help you avoid unnecessary headaches. And remember, if you are still shopping for insurance, you only have until March 31st to enroll in a plan.
For enrollment help before the deadline information please contact our team at Millennium Medical Solutions Corp (855)667-4621. We have Spanish, Russian, and Hebrew speakers available. Quotes can also be viewed on our site.
With less than 45 days before the first Affordable Care Act Open Enrollment set to end its important to understand the role of both Brokers and Navigators. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) requires States to establish a “Navigator” Program to help educate consumers about Health Exchange marketplace. With the new health insurance exchanges a broker can act either as a traditional broker or a navigator (but not both). The info-graph below illustrates how navigators will differ from brokers.
Specifically, agents and brokers play a vital role in the developing health insurance exchanges nation wide. As the individuals with the education and expertise to advise and help select health insurance products for families and businesses large and small, health insurance agents, brokers and consultants occupy a unique place in the health care coverage system.
We educate consumers on their health care coverage choices, help them select the most appropriate plans for their specific needs, and serve as their advocate if problems should arise. Subject to strict state licensing laws and education requirements, agents, brokers and consultants are critical to not only the health insurance enrollment process, but also in serving the healthinsurance coverage needs of individuals and employers after the point of sale.
Benefit specialists design benefit plans, explain coordination issues of public and private benefits to individuals and employees, and solve complex claims and billing issues. We help design and implement cutting-edge health promotion and wellness programs and help our clients comply with state and federal laws like newly enacted PPACA, HIPAA, COBRA and ERISA.
Professional agents, brokers and consultants continue to assist individuals and small businesses with their coverage needs long after the point of sale. Whereas a travel agent is finished with a client after the travel is completed, benefit specialists continues to serve as compliance experts, health and wellness promoters and the prominent contact for complex claims and billing issues. Health insurance coverage is a longstanding commitment for American consumers and often requires guidance from benefit specialists when dealing with a complex healthcare system.
For more information regarding both Exchanges – Individual Exchanges or SHOP please contact our team at Millennium Medical Solutions Corp (855)667-4621. We work in coordination with Navigators to assist with medicaid, CHIP Child Health Plus, Family Health Plus and Medicare Dual Eligibles. We have Spanish, Russian, and Hebrew speakers available. Quotes can also be viewed on our site.
Officials in at least a half dozen states are pushing back against health plans in the new insurance markets that limit choice of doctors and hospitals in a bid to control medical costs.
The plans don’t start offering coverage until January but they’re facing regulatory action, possible legislation, and in at least one case involving a high-profile children’s hospital, litigation.
The pushback against “narrow” provider networks recalls the backlash against managed care and health maintenance organizations in the 1990s. Protests from consumers and hospitals eroded those attempts to restrain expenses by narrowing provider networks.
Now criticism of limited networks has risen as consumers realize that, despite President Barack Obama’s pledge that they could keep their doctors, their Affordable Care Act insurance may not include the physicians or hospitals they’ve been seeing.
The critique feeds into the politically damaging outcry over the millions of people whose health plans were cancelled. It’s unclear whether the limited choice of doctors and other providers will be as much of a concern to uninsured people who will be gaining subsidized coverage through the state-based marketplaces.
Still regulators and elected officials in a few states have already forced changes. Others are weighing legislation that could expand the networks. Legal fights are brewing. In some cases, the officials are responding to complaints of health care systems or providers that were excluded.
In Maine, state regulators prohibited Anthem BlueCross BlueShield from switching some customers to a network sold through the Affordable Care Act’s marketplace that excluded six of the state’s hospitals.
In Washington State, the insurance commissioner initially banned several health plans from the online exchange for what he called inadequate caregiver networks. Some of the plans have broadened networks; the dispute continues with others.
In New Hampshire Anthem’s 2014 marketplace plans exclude more than a third of the state’s hospitals. Lawmakers have written legislation that would force insurers to expand choice.
Anthem will “use the excuse, ‘Well, we’re going to save money by having a narrow network,’” said State Rep. Bill Nelson, a Republican who sponsored the bill pendingin the New Hampshire legislature. “Sure that could happen for some people, but other people are going to be losers. Imagine having to change the doctor you’ve had for years.”
South Dakota, Pennsylvania and Mississippi are discussing measures similar to Nelson’s, known as “any-willing-provider” laws that would force insurers to accept more participants in the networks.
Broader choice comes with a price. The ability to sell less-expensive plans with limited choices of doctors and hospitals helps contain medical inflation, health economists argue. Looser networks could. mean higher prices.
“We had narrow networks in the ‘90s. Health-care prices not only moderated, but actually there was one year where they fell,” said Northwestern University professor David Dranove, who specializes in the health care industry. “Then we had the HMO backlash and we had broad networks [again], and health care prices went through the roof.”
In a typical narrow network, offered in many states under the new ACA rules, caregivers agree to lower prices in expectation of more patients. Insurers pass some of the savings to consumers. Done correctly, limited networks can also save money because family doctors, specialists and hospitals who are all part of the same network do a better job of coordinating care, many health policy experts believe.
Excluding certain hospitals from Anthem’s New Hampshire narrow plan would allow premiums to be 25 percent lower than they otherwise would have been, a company spokesman said. Anthem’s narrow Maine plan would save 12 percent, he said.
Insurers are supposed to compete side-by-side in the health law’s subsidized, online exchanges. Under the ACA, they must all now offer certain basic health benefits and they must cover anyone, regardless of pre-existing conditions.
On this new legal terrain, they compete by offering their best combination of price and providers directly to individuals and families who lack other coverage. Adjusting caregiver rosters is one of the few remaining ways insurers can lower costs, limited-network advocates say.
But others argue that these narrow networks can force patients to switch doctors or drive long distances for care if a key hospital is left out of the plan, especially in states such as Maine and New Hampshire with few insurers selling through the ACA marketplace.
“Whenever you have an extremely narrow network there are potential problems for patients with cancer and for patients with any chronic condition, particularly when it requires the patient to go out of network,” said Kirsten Sloan, senior director of policy for the American Cancer Society Cancer Action Network.
Leaving a network to seek specialized care can lead to enormous out-of-pocket bills, she said.
In extreme cases networks could be too small to serve all the plan members they sign up.
“It’s no good making a narrow network that nobody can get in to see,” said Sander Domaszewicz, a senior benefits consultant at Mercer.
Insurers began unveiling ACA marketplace plans with narrow networks in recent months for coverage that starts in January 2014. Policymakers soon challenged them in several states, often pushed by excluded hospitals and their patients.
Maine Insurance Superintendent Eric Cioppa blocked Anthem from switching several thousand existing subscribers to a plan that excluded Central Maine Medical Center and partner doctors and hospitals. Anthem argued that shrinking its network would provide less-expensive but still high-quality care.
This summer Washington Insurance Commissioner Mike Kreidler blocked five insurers from selling through the exchange, in several cases because of network problems. One plan, he said, would have required people to drive nearly 50 miles to see a cardiologist and more than 100 miles to see a gastroenterologist.
Four plans protested Kreidler’s ban. Three reached settlements, some by adjusting networks. An administrative judge ruled in favor of another, Coordinated Care, whose network doesn’t include a children’s hospital.
Seattle Children’s Hospital, left out of networks including Coordinated Care’s, then sued Kreidler, alleging he failed to ensure adequate access to care.
In New Hampshire, Anthem’s decision to leave hospitals out of its network has prompted at least one to threaten litigation, and Nelson to introduce his bill. Anthem’s network could force some patients in his district to drive a dozen of miles or more to get routine care, he said
In few places has the fight over networks been fiercer than in Mississippi. BlueCross Blue Shield of Mississippi cancelled in-network contracts over the summer with Health Management Associates, a for-profit chain with 10 hospitals in the state.
Blue Cross isn’t selling insurance in 2014 through Mississippi’s federally run ACA marketplace, but many expect it to come on board later.
In response HMA took to the airwaves in protest and pitted the insurance commissioner, who wanted only four hospitals reinstated, against the governor, who ordered the insurer to take back all 10.
“I’ve been practicing law for 36 years and I have never seen as aggressive an effort to sway public opinion as these guys engaged in,” said David Kaufman, an outside lawyer for BlueCross BlueShield of Mississippi said of the hospital chain. “You could not go to your mailbox, pick up a newspaper, watch TV, listen to the radio or answer your home phone without hearing that Blue Cross is the devil.”
Blue Cross sued Gov. Phil Bryant, arguing the order was unconstitutional, noting that his daughter works for HMA’s law firm and pointing out that HMA is one of his top campaign contributors. Bryant backed off but ordered Insurance Commissioner Mike Chaney to hold hearings. He refused. Bryant and Cheney, both Republicans, have clashed repeatedly over the federal health law.
Now Mississippi, too, is talking about an any-willing-provider law, which typically requires insurers to take any hospital, clinic or doctor under terms accepted by other participants.
Such a rule would tell Blue Cross that “it can’t kick somebody out of the hospital of their choice,” HMA executive Paul Hurst told WFMN radio’s Paul Gallo on a show broadcast statewide.
But in any state, making every insurer accept every hospital, “is going to throttle competition,” said Dranove, the Northwestern professor who specializes in the health industry. “And this is a healthcare reform that depends entirely on competition. So the people who are fighting for broad networks… are ultimately fighting for the demise of Obamacare.”
Millennium Medical Solutions Inc. will continue to monitor and report on narrow net- work plans and other efforts by insurers to control costs in the PPACA environment.
NYS Health Exchange 100,000 Enrolled. According to a USA Today article More than 100,000 enroll in N.Y. health exchange, up a third in less than two weeks according to the state Health Department .
According to the NYS Exchange site www.nystateofhealth.ny.gov– As of today, 100,881 state residents had enrolled in a health insurance plan through the state’s exchange. Additionally, 314,146 people had “completed applications” for coverage. The state did not break down the latest data based on the number of people enrolling in private insurance versus Medicaid. The state’s already “vast” Medicaid system “has been credited with having an easier transition to the health exchange.” New York state plans to enroll a total of 1.1 million people by the end of 2016
New York already has a vast Medicaid program, at an annual cost of $50 billion, it has been credited with having an easier transition to the health exchange. Reuters reported Dec. 4 that about 29,000 people signed up for health insurance through the federal HealthCare.gov website on Dec. 1 and Dec. 2 – eclipsing the 26,000 for all of October.
According to sources and our experience half of the Exchange applicants were to determined not be Medicaid eligible. The article Federal exchange sends unqualified people to Medicaid points out that some qualified Medicaid may not in fact be eligible. “The federal health care exchange is incorrectly determining that some people are eligible for Medicaid when they clearly are not, leaving them with little chance to get the subsidized insurance they are entitled to as the Dec. 23 deadline for enrollment approaches.”
New York State, unlike 36 states, runs its own exchange. The NYS website has had less issues than the troubled Federal health Exchange www.healthcare.gov. Our blog NYS Approves Health Insurance Exchange Rates describes how the new rates lower individual insurance market by 50%.
New York has various tiers of health insurers, and customers can pick from 16 insurers and 10 dental insurers. Quotes can also be viewed on our site. The program also has a small-business marketplace that offers health insurance to businesses with 50 or fewer employees. Large businesses that do not offer employees health insurance could be hit with a fine in 2015.
The exchange also offers tax credits to those who earn less than $45,960 as an individual or $94,200 as a family of four.People without health insurance would be hit with a fine on their income taxes for 2014, starting at about $95 or 1 percent of gross income. The fine can grow to as much as $695 a year , then double in 2015 and grow over time.
For more information regarding both Exchanges – Individual Exchanges or SHOP please contact our team at Millennium Medical Solutions Corp. We have Spanish, Russian, and Hebrew speakers available. Quotes can also be viewed on our site.
The following companies had health insurance plan rates for the health benefits exchange approved today by DFS. The rates approved today are subject to final certification of the insurers’ participation in the exchange.
Affinity Health Plan, Inc.
American Progressive Life & Health Insurance Company of New York
